Trust is everything in a relationship and without it a connection is meaningless and a bond throwaway.
So, how do you build this trust? Openness…… respect…… offering a quality experience. The funny thing is that it’s not just your girlfriend that will appreciate it when she can trust you, Google will too.
Trust is a significant and often overlooked factor in SEO
Remember the crazy girlfriend that cut up your suits one Tuesday evening before you came home from work because you smiled at the pretty barista. Those suits could be your site and that girlfriend could be Google. If Google doesn’t trust your site, you’re fighting an uphill battle.
Measuring trust can be done manually through examining a potential linking site’s backlink profile, or automatically via either Majestic Trust Flow (TF) and Citation Flow (CF) metrics, or Moz’s MozTrust and Moz Flow metrics. Both metrics use a list of seeded trust sources vs the number of citations a site has and base their rankings on the distance between the site being examined and these sources of trust.
Though not exactly the same, both are similar in that they have to be compared and a disparity in the metrics suggests a problem. The larger the disparity, the higher the likelihood there’s a lack of trust.
As an example a site with a TF 30 and CF 30 has a 1:1 ratio, which is a good thing. However a site with a TF 5 and a CF45 has a ratio of 1:9 which would suggest it’s very spammy.
Have you ever seen a site with only a few links outranking a one with times the amount and far higher metrics? Well, the reason this happens is that Google trusts that site and it has a higher ‘TrustRank’.
Sites with high trust in Google’s eyes survive negative SEO attacks without even flinching, they rank well for information they provide and they survive Google update after Google update, often going from strength to strength.
So, how do you increase the level of trust that Google has in your site. Well, there are a number of ways and we’re going to take a look at the link based ones that matter.
If you ever created an academic article you’ll remember using the references and citations and honouring sources.
Doing this backs up facts, helps people delve deeper into a subject and shows that any statement you make can be trusted. Any article or piece you create for your blog or site should do the same. It needs to cite sources and the more the merrier.
Linking out to authority, trusted sites not only creates a better on-site experience but also helps the level of trust Google has in your site. It’s easy to understand why. If you can back up your facts and statements with relevant information from authority sites then your content is likely to be a lot more accurate and of higher quality than one where there are no links and information could be just pulled out of the sky.
The information doesn’t even have to be editorial; you can add sources and references at the bottom of the content or page to back up your statements.
Of course, it’s not just outbound links that create trust – not at all! Links from high quality, high authority sites to yours matter.
These high quality sites are a handful of high quality trusted sites. At the very top of this pyramid are .edu sites, .gov sites, big news sites such as BBC and large industry authority sites. In an ideal world you backlink profile would be made up from these sorts of links.
BBC >My Site> Great Ranking
However, this isn’t easily achieved. However, getting links from sites with links from these amazing sites is a more realistic prospect. Placing this simply in perspective
BBC> Site we Post on > My Site> Very Good Ranking
We’re one degree away from a high quality source and because of this still getting a lot of benefit from the authority site. Needless to say that the more degrees of separation there are between the authority link and your site, the less trust there is.
Backlink profile matters more than metrics (to a degree)
Which would you rather a link from?
- Site 1 – PR2, DA30 with 1x BBC.com link and 1x .Gov Link
- Site 2 – PR4, DA45 with nothing of note and lots of blog comments
Well, if you’re looking for trust, you’re going to choose the first link even if the Site 2 has a lot more going for it on first impressions. By doing this you create a more trusted, resilient site with a better backlink profile.
Google has its own very visible criteria for trust in Google News. It’s pretty sensible when you think about it.
If Google is willing to include a site in its trusted news sources, then it’s going to trust that site as one that delivers quality news. If all other things are equal a site that’s in Google News is going to be more trusted than a site that’s not in Google News.
Like all the good things in life, getting a link from a site that’s in Google News isn’t easy. However, as Eric Ward always a mention, if a link is hard to get then it’s probably worth getting.
Trust is and has always been a big ranking factor and one that will help your site in a number of ways now and into the SEO future well past 2015. Utilising the above tactics around link can help improve the level of TrustRank Google has around your site and it’s certainly worth considering.
I’ve already done a very useful round-up of how one can still build / attract solid backlinks to your site. Today I’ll follow up with a few more general, yet resourceful tips on how bloggers can still earn backlinks to their content.
Bloggers can still build links, and those who have always sought out solid links in the first place will find much of the practice hasn’t changed. You are still aiming to provide quality, valuable content that explores a topic you are an expert in. You are potentially going to link to other sources – either your own, or third party – in order to further enrich that content. You create something of value, and you deserve links coming in – this is a short story…
Let’s look at that in more details:
Create Good Content
In the end, your best bet is always going to be creating good, solid and engaging content that people want to share. I won’t pretend that there is some magic formula to follow that will get you those links, or that will boost you into viral status… there isn’t. But the better your content, the more likely it will be seen and enjoyed.
Bookmark this blogging guide to get a better idea of what types of content you can create and how to do that right:
Get Your Content Out There…
There’s nothing wrong in being discoverable. There’s nothing wrong in being pro-active about being discovered. And I don’t mean asking someone for a link. I mean being pro-active about letting more people see your content (and possibly link to it at some point)
The most obvious is probably social media. You want influencers, or just others, to share out your work. Targeting your user base is one way, but jumping on someone else’s coat tails is a great boost for visibility, and increasing chances of even more social links.
Viral Content Buzz is a great way to put your content in front of eager social media sharers for wider reach. In most cases, this is the easiest (and free!) method to get your content discovered by bloggers as well!
A new term has been coined recently: “ego baiting”. This is the process of mentioning someone in your content, as well as quoting, praising or even scorning them. In theory, they should fall victim to their ego and choose to share out that content, or link to it as a reference for their own post. It sounds a lot shadier than it is; if you have a genuine statement to make about someone else or their work, there is no reason you should write about it.
Chances are, you have taken part in ego baiting without even realizing it. You know those top ten lists you make that link to people’s content or websites? Those mentions potentially catch their attention, leading to those “Hey, a shout-out to (Your Name) for including me in (Article)!” social media posts.
MyBlogU is a great way to attract people to your content who will then help you promote your content on social media and link back to the articles they got featured!
If you make one of these posts, or anything else that heavily features another blogger, send them an email letting them know they are in it. Maybe they will share the link, maybe they won’t. But at least you will have taken a shot.
If you have any ideas for building links as a blogger, let us know in the comments. We would love to hear from you!
I am in the industry long enough to have witnessed both the growth and decline in the popularity of “web directory” phenomenon.
Web directories emerged prior to search engines as the means to help people discover websites online. During Google times, web directories were used to build backlinks and extra visibility for a website. Then they became popular among link builders – from where the concept abuse started.
There is an argument that link building hasn’t killed web directories. What happened instead is that directories were no longer needed (search engines did the job) but is it really so? To me, it’s the same as to say that Wikipedia is not needed thanks for Google Knowledge Graph (yes, I realize the knowledge graph is being built based on Wikipedia, hence the sarcasm)
The difference between web directories and search engines is that high-quality web directories are heavily moderated. The purpose of today’s web directory is to provide the well-structured database of high-quality websites.
Hence good directories can still be useful:
- To build your site co-citation signals
- To put your site in the most relevant immediate contest
- To build more brand name mentions and awareness (to help build digital footprint)
Below I am listing selected directories that are still driving value to your website (if you are listed there) but more importantly, provide valuable user experience.
Requirements to be listed
Why is it here?
No “mirror” and non-original-content sites”, no sites with illegal content, no sites with mostly affiliate links
The fact that Google still trusts Dmoz enough to show “anchor text or listings from” it is pretty self-explanatory.
“Sites must serve as a resource for businesses or business professionals”. They actually have very strict guidelines listed here
Listing your site there actually drives traffic and brings trust. Note: I did find a few a bit forced “exact-match anchor text listings there” which I’d avoid if I were them
No sites with broken links, only family-friendly sites, sites with cross-browser support, no sites with pop-ups,
Each site has a separate page listing * some stats, helpful links as well as description and most useful pages from that domain. That could become a powerful brand name asset! They also offer free webmaster tools and have a separate “local” directory
“Our users expect relevant results with appropriate ratings”: sufficient content and contact info (for business websites) are required
I actually LOVED the site search feature ** showing different features of each website: It shows the site is very-well curated!
Cross-browser support, no sites with “under construction” pages
It’s hard not to mention Yahoo when talking about directories. They say it’s too expensive to justify it though.
No pharmacy, affiliate-only, redirected sites (The guidelines are rather vague: “it is difficult to name the exact websites we reject”)
Best results are labeled. Category pages have lots of content beyond links. They provide 100 / 300-word review for each site (So they write the copy themselves: Neat!)
No websites with illegal or pornographic content, no affiliate or MLM sites, no mirror and non-original sites
The site overall is very user-friendly. I liked the individual listing pages: They have “related articles” and the ability to comment and rate
I actually couldn’t find clear quality guidelines on their submission page (I can assume it’s located elsewhere)
Positions itself more as a “human-empowered” search engine (they claim to have a crawler of their own), has a great focus on community
*Dir Journal listing screenshot:
**JoeAnt search results:
I wasn’t able to find any arguments pro or against the below directories (or something worth noting in the “Why is it here?” column above), so I am just listing them because I know they have a very good reputation:
- Aviva directory: One of the oldest, best-known directories out there. They say it’s trusted and can even drive traffic.
- Alive Directory: Interestingly, it shows number of clicks on each link (A good sign it’s actually able of sending traffic)
- Skaffe: I like that they show Google Plus button and have “Address” and telephone. I wish they supported that more (most listings provide no telephone; I couldn’t find a zip code that would have any search results)
- Lots of local directories are listed here
- Web App Directories to Promote Your Startup by Justin McGill @jus10mcgill
- Major Search Engines and Directories at Search Engine Watch.
What are your thoughts about web directories nowadays? Please share your thoughts!