Google Optimization
  Home arrow Google Optimization arrow Page 3 - Google`s Quality Rater Guidelines Leak...
SEO Chat Forums  
Choosing Keywords  
Google Optimization  
Link Trading  
MSN Optimization  
Search Engine News  
Search Engine Spiders  
Search Optimization  
Web Directories  
Website Marketing  
Website Promotion  
Website Submission  
Yahoo Optimization  
SEO Tools
Adsense Calculator
AdSense Preview
Advanced Meta-Tags
Alexa Rank Tool
Check Server Headers
Class C Checker
Code to Text Ratio
CPM Calculator
Domain Age Check
Domain Typos
Future PageRank
Google Dance
Google Keywords
Google Search
Google Suggest
Google vs Yahoo
Indexed Pages
Keyword Cloud
Keyword Density
Keyword Difficulty
Keyword Optimizer
Keyword Position
Keyword Typos
Link Popularity
Link Price Calculator
Meta Analyzer
Meta Tag Generator
Multiple Link Popularity
Page Comparison
Page Size
PageRank Lookup
PageRank Search
Robots.txt Generator
ROI Calculator 
S.E. Comparison 
S.E. Keyword Position 
Site Link Analyzer 
Spider Simulator 
URL Redirect Check 
URL Rewriting 
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
SEO Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
GOOGLE OPTIMIZATION

Google`s Quality Rater Guidelines Leaked
By: Ivan Strouchliak
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars / 10
    2009-01-13

    Table of Contents:
  • Google`s Quality Rater Guidelines Leaked
  • Researching and Understanding the Query
  • Useful and Relevant
  • Inside the Raters HUB

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    Google`s Quality Rater Guidelines Leaked - Useful and Relevant


    (Page 3 of 4 )

    Useful

    I believe Google builds 80 percent of its search results with this measurement:

    A rating of Useful is assigned to pages that contain some or all of the following characteristics: highly satisfying, comprehensive, high in quality, and authoritative. Useful pages answer the query just right; they are neither too broad nor too specific.

    The document also lists types of useful pages:

    • a page that is highly informative.

    • a timely and informative article.

    • a page that allows the user to complete the intended transaction.

    • an important subpage on a correct site.

    • a home page of a correct site for a specific product. If the query "asks" for a list, then a directory (a collection of links) can be Useful, e.g. [ fudge recipes ], [ books about sharks ].

    A search engine optimization campaign should aim towards getting pages classified as "useful."

    We can come to a conclusion with which you're already familiar: "Content is King." I personally spend a lot of time developing the best content in the industry for personal and internal projects, aiming to be classified as:

    • "a page that is highly informative"

    • "a page that allows the user to complete the intended transaction"

    The duo listed above forms a powerful alliance and makes both Google and users happy. A good example is Aaron's article on search engine algorithms.

    Relevant

    This rating is lower than useful and doesn't get as many kudos from raters as a "useful" page does.

    A rating of Relevant is assigned to pages that have fewer valuable attributes than were listed for Useful pages. Relevant pages might be less comprehensive, come from a less authoritative source, or cover only one important aspect of the query.

    If you read blogs and SEO articles, you are probably familiar with the words: "Provide useful and relevant content to users." This is what most decent websites do, and I believe this is not enough to set you apart. I come back often to the wonderful examples by SEOmoz, wiep.net, and Aaron Wall, who kill in the area of "useful and relevant content," providing super industry standard articles. This is the content that gathers links.

    Relevant content is easy to produce, so aim higher.

    Sometimes you'll be classified as "merely" relevant because there are few sources available and you're the closest thing. I wouldn't worry about those.

    Non Relevant / Off Topic / Didn't Load / Foreign Language

    This is common sense. Pages that don't load or that are off topic are removed from search results. I believe Google also automatically removes 404s and other error messages.

    Refer to the document for a full list.

    There are three more sections: Unratable, Pornography and Malicious, but they are of little use (unless you're in the porn business or attach viruses to your pages).

    More Google Optimization Articles
    More By Ivan Strouchliak


       · Good article. If Google even had 20,000 reviewers, would that be enough to make a...
     

    GOOGLE OPTIMIZATION ARTICLES

    - Google Adwords Guide
    - Create a Customized Google XML Sitemap
    - Google Website Optimizer Review
    - Using Analytics to Understand Your Readers
    - Google Sandbox Effect
    - Improve Google Indexing on Your Ecommerce We...
    - Back Links and Google Page Rank
    - The Five Most Important Things You Can Do wi...
    - Advanced Traffic Analysis Techniques with Go...
    - How to Build an Online Survey with Google Do...
    - How to Analyze and Rate Keyword Difficulty i...
    - Using Analytics on Your Site
    - Google Algorithms
    - How Google`s Quality Raters Treat Web Spam
    - Google`s Quality Rater Guidelines Leaked



     



    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 6 Hosted by Hostway
    For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek